Discussion Paper Series A No.299 Coordination Failures under Incomplete Information and Global Games
نویسندگان
چکیده
Carlsson and van Damme (1991, 93) presented a notion of a global game, which is an incomplete information game where the actual payoff structure is affected by a realization of a common shock and where each player gets noisy private information of the shock. For n-person symmetric games with two possible actions characterized by strategic complementarity, they showed that equilibrium play in a global game with vanishing noise is uniquely determined. The concept of global games is important not only as a theory of the most refined notion of equilibrium but also as a theory of coordination failures under private information. From this viewpoint, this paper makes the theory of global games more general and more applicable to such problems. The implications of the theory of global games are investigated in two specific models: a speculative attack model and a network externality model. It is shown that both the monetary authority in the speculative attack model and the central planner in the network externality model will prefer the equilibrium in a global game with small noise to the worst equilibrium in the corresponding complete information game. Therefore, they will welcome the existence of small noise, if they apply mini-max principle to multiple equilibrium problems.
منابع مشابه
Revisiting games of incomplete information with analogy-based expectations
This paper studies the effects of analogy-based reasoning in static two-player games of incomplete information. As in Jehiel (“Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibrium”, Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming) players are assumed to be boundedly rational in the way they forecast their opponent’s state-contingent strategy. They bundle states into analogy classes and play best responses to their op...
متن کاملGlobal Games: Theory and Applications∗
Global games are games of incomplete information whose type space is determined by the players each observing a noisy signal of the underlying state. With strategic complementarities, global games often have a unique, dominance solvable equilibrium, allowing analysis of a number of economic models of coordination failure. For symmetric binary action global games, equilibrium strategies in the l...
متن کاملStrategic Asymmetry in Dynamic Coordination Games with Learning
This paper studies a simple model of dynamic coordination with learning under incomplete information. We show that strategic asymmetry arises where the predecessor’s strategy is a strategic substitute for the successor’s while the latter is a strategic complement for the former. The role of dynamics and learning is identified by comparing the strategic interactions in the coordination games wit...
متن کاملCooperative Benefit and Cost Games under Fairness Concerns
Solution concepts in cooperative games are based on either cost games or benefit games. Although cost games and benefit games are strategically equivalent, that is not the case in general for solution concepts. Motivated by this important observation, a new property called invariance property with respect to benefit/cost allocation is introduced in this paper. Since such a property can be regar...
متن کاملSentiments, strategic uncertainty, and information structures in coordination games∗
We study experimentally how changes in the information structure affect behavior in regime change coordination games with incomplete information (global games). We find two systematic departures from the theory: (1) the comparative statics of equilibrium thresholds and signal precision are reversed, and (2) as information becomes very precise subjects’behavior approximates the effi cient equili...
متن کامل